YouTube.com
September 05, 2009
September 1 2009, Jack Blood Interviews Dr. David Ray Griffin on Deadline Live. Debunking National Geographic's 9/11 Science and Conspiracy.
___________________________________________________________
In regard to the interview Pat Curley of the Screw Loose Change blog states:
"He is criticising National Geographic for confusing incendiaries and explosives, and then he takes thermite, an incendiary, and says that all of their writings discuss how it is used as an explosive. Yeah... OK..."
Yeah OK? Good debunking there Pat.
"One of the critiques of theories that thermite was used to destroy the World Trade Center skyscrapers asserts that thermite preparations don't have sufficient explosive power to account for the observed features of the buildings' destruction. This criticism seems to be uninformed by knowledge of some of the aluminothermic preparations known to exist -- particularly those being researched for military applications." - Source: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/theories/thermitetech.html
Stop acting like you don't know this Pat. Nat Geo damn well knew it too.
Next he quotes Griffin:
"Even if you did have steel columns and beams that started lose strength, you would have the building start to sag and lean to one side maybe. Floors start to droop down. No, you got a building that's absolutely solid. Absolutely still and then all of a sudden it collapses."
And responds with:
"WHAT?! Have any of you morons actually read the NIST report? The whole collapse was started by those 'drooping floors'. They even have pictures!"
Yeah, here is one of those pictures, and an explanation of why this argument is totally baseless. Griffin is aware of the inward bowing of perimeter columns prior to the collapses, he brings it up in his book Debunking 9/11 Debunking. He obviously is talking about a more extreme event.
Related Info:
9/11: Junk Science and Conspiracy – The Fairy tale narrative that goes down like Soma By Jack Blood
Dear friends who've just viewed the National Geographic Conspiracy Theory on 9/11
Exchange of emails (March 2009) with Robert Erickson, producer of the National Geographic special on 9/11
National Geographic Does 9/11: Another Icon Debased in Service of the Big Lie - Like Popular Mechanics' 9/11 Lies Straw Man, only dumber?
Finally, an apology from the National Geographic Channel
National Geographic vs Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup
National Geographic Channel on 9/11: Manipulation vs. Objectivity
THE INFOWARRIOR with Jason Bermas: Jason Debunks National Geographic & No Planes BS!
Alex Jones and Richard Gage Debunk the National Geographic Hit Piece on 9/11 Truth
National Geographic: "Science" and "Psychology"
National Geographic Should Stick to Documentaries About Girls Who Cry Blood
Sander Hicks: "National Geographic Pseudo-Science?"
National Geographic hitpiece will prove 9/11 fire collapse theory to be impossible.
National Geographic to Air New 911 "Documentary".